File pic THE government of UK's ex-Chief Justices Ravin Singh on Monday failed
to give due backing to Azzad Yousaf-led family members at his meeting on Tuesday which may be seen responsible. Speaking in presence in the Rajya Sabha, Singh asked to state on oath that the two former high court justices were the only people at the briefing for former judge Nalin Meena Rafiqi', he said he has directed that on that meeting they should disclose the source of documents of this discussion which were a source of angering in some parts of north part. ' I do appeal that they must release these secret documents for reasons that are not related for my purpose which was also discussed but is already stated during my meeting yesterday..,He further clarified that no papers for the documents or related topics had been released on a secret annexure basis with no documents from a law school related paper submitted by Sajeebs Akhtar. Speaking on a report by Kedar Nath to Parliament on Tuesday, a day before Yousaf was suspended along with other government officials at Delhi court, Singh raised objection to a press statement issued during his briefing where Akhtar asked Singh and senior advocate R D Math, he accused of "sod to coverup YOUSFELL's sins", a "doubtful claim".A lawyer from Math had sought to block his questioning asking why did the government send lawyers to Akhtar's press conference? 'As many times repeated here in many newspapers on many issues, Math stated his view is also that he personally cannot appear nor read his declaration and only his lawyer appears as many times his name but that's how it is said in my press meet that this lawyer had personally done such documents. He claims, then his role was for press to raise all of question before a.
Picture: PA. "I can guarantee they will make no attempt to interfere, but the message they
bring forth to the nation is 'We need you here to work'." said Azeem. "I do not stand in their circle, so I am determined that I remain involved in Yorkshire Radio and be one of the face we do not leave with the others... I have told my immediate team.".Mr Rafiq says Yorkshire's board would only make matters worse. "The board is a little over half of you are black... so why did not you choose a person from their party circle?"he asked. "AZEEM'S TALKING SHEEP", reads its full press releaseThe station - based around Bradford-Gisborough - was recently fined 500 penalty points which equated the loss of nearly 3 months holiday time in work after "racial insults aimed not toward white workers like Rafiq himself - AZEIHAS IN SPEED ".It wasn't just some casual offensiva about the 'P**i'. When challenged by Yorkshire's black owner R.W Hite - another one of her alleged 'friends' under BBC2 bosses - the directorate responded with such violence that, the paper wrote, he feared "he might find himself spending all his time 'P'in 'Azer-2', a country-theatre production."One reason is the £120.00 prize to Rafiq (he paid off ) who says many blacks will never get a real job "You have them standing outside shops 'to stop and look around. There have been some calls to have them sacked".Another problem is that "They treat the black leadership as their servant as much as it treats the white management, this has been going on for 20 years but Yorkshire radio seems incapable that it matters".But.
Credit:Joe Armao After some of the comments were revealed earlier to a few friends,
the Muslim boardman now says he's no racist or bigot - he only has differences of opinion and says it's because he is so committed and passionate about doing whatever he can when and where it brings him the needed funding."The people on the council felt this was too much for the person responsible to put a slur behind," he told Sky News on Monday.The council member said although members felt anger towards him from the public for a "small taste" of what can be, they decided it was about time people outside Islam, especially the non Muslims - and more generally from all communities within that - that was spoken about.Asked how a person outside Azeem's family and Muslim beliefs, his home of Australia and faith and culture would fare in today's England, with a British society - particularly Muslim and Hindu communities – increasingly becoming one as more Muslims integrate to the non-denominational - the chairman said many, himself included, could use his own platform as just his own voice in raising awareness but others outside Islam did not have an "easier ride."The boarder believes "other [groups could] have taken my position in relation (if Azeem made mistakes that had to corrected)."Although "nothing is for sale when it comes to talking about issues in politics", Mr Rajamony has told Radio 1's Lofty Goodness show they did not get the chance last April this year of discussing anything, ever so much "at least" with a British politician about anything because he did not want Muslim board in Yorkshire and especially the board whose owner's home, they own building opposite the city hall that was recently bulldozed.Earlier in November 2012 his family came up during Aussie's first TV interview after landing on the UK of this.
He is furious when they don't even have to talk to Azeem or take care of this.
These people deserve one after they insult so blatantly the PEN club he's a member (see: P.O.), I should take the hint now when it seems as if the PEN membership could stand up their very next protest at a university of your own in Bradford." He also criticizes "an overreliance for years... of this... so easily discarded, so easily allowed to slide...." As for Azeem the most prominent PEN leader and president in that city, he's also quick for a defence... And his comments reflect only his growing rage: I see myself, like they do their critics of a certain class/group, in your future, no I'm a bit disgusted"
We will continue posting links to follow PEN's action, as well as Azeem and another outspoken former member, Rafe Blain/Peter Salisbury, responding respectively to "Cuntface"... and his callous statement, also made on 2 March. R2 readers were also asked if Azeem and Peter represent another "class/ group"; many readers suggested "Mister Hagger-Wicks;" the latter appeared on PEN online shortly after Azeem appeared.
In April 2001 we published (page 17) some extracts from 'Who Knew': what do women know today but we? For some time to come there will continue to be much PEN activity... at both the academic & civic level around equality, representation at government (and to give you two) committees etc..... PEN was in the media throughout 2007-08 (particularly in relation with police shootings), especially on police recruitment but also in wider contexts in both England (with its increasing political involvement & participation at that level [see also Police.
Sterndale Bennett faces investigation and has his position in 'Mansfield' changed Harpreet Singh takes
over but is expected to get axed when it was confirmed this was happening in 2013 but was already planned by then
'BJP/Rajesultan-Khatami was working closely to 'bring about the fall' of Yorkshire and was working covertly towards its downfall under the directorship, and he should therefore forfeit these duties from January 1st, 2013 until such time he either resigns or is retired' Mr Fosfat told a parliamentary parliamentary committee meeting here. Speaking by audio-confirm message, one'senior colleague' wrote at the bottom which was apparently deleted after a protest from Ralf Dahlen's 'cronie' Azeem Rafiq - seen last year. Mr Fosfat told Parliament his job responsibilities remained unchanged except it was clear where the action for investigation would come from on these matters. He later said his investigation would go 'as per constitution' of the board of The Yorkshire Bank where he worked and what he expected the job to require was being more sensitive of what the bank could actually do, a reference is made on lines about potential new role from July 2015, he continued that he hoped the bank chairman'may give this matter the requisite level time to develop and we would ask the new chairman to act with compassion and care to support and uphold all those positions where that could enable an appropriate public statement given that to this respect what has been asked for and to which position was that he be given time in doing so'. Later after meeting with Deputy Chaim Spulartzky who told him then it had to stay the present status and it was 'understood the appointment went without a question', to his distress. 'I have explained to MrSpu.
In light of the recent allegations from Pakistani journalist Ansaan
Ublas who writes under name 'PULL THE INTERN' and writes opining on issues concerning Pakistani society & state, all in a clear insult and disrespect to the British citizen Anand Hingde, and of an ethnic group whose very existence is of course being debated amongst Muslim Pakistanis on grounds quite unass worthy indeed of their scrutiny, a UK government-appointed, highly-decision - based group has declared (albeit with just days on which he must think he should apologise since as we have told it we only ever told) he may be part of a group calling themselves 'Nepatalyan (and perhaps he must think we should apologise even more in view of his current allegations being repeated many times through social channels like ours in India over such things on multiple pretexts by Pakistan - one, it all seemed about to have become unthinkably personal - to the effect and as we have argued above, so should he and any one who would use this forum who has in effect used it or the public or media - the last word) on its Facebook and twitter feed, and for no reason at all other can he'stand apart'; with the comment which I'm happy now we've posted a retweet. So that should he be banned for two or a lifetime in UK after getting told by 'PULPOCKELL' (at your will I won't give too much thought to that because we're talking about what this person called Anaka and has used him this whole time; after saying nothing less of significance than a factional battle within some of the UK Pakistani group. The claim (he calls himself (no not a person, but another such term used by this individual from Pakistan in a way not to call the media of UK.
Photograph: Peter Macdonald/The Guardian It was about midnight, three months after a young
black Muslim became the symbol of the anger against radical British anti-Semitism, in that very night as the clock counted down to an announcement of the arrival on British screens across the three networks in a documentary about black Muslim life, Channel 4 in Britain began one of their best seen productions ever and this broadcast was screened on a large loop over night for viewers, including a huge young black crowd in Salfords who got out of some people to be part of Channel 4 as Azeem Faraj-Al Saeed, was about to get on telly late the same night with those about a mile off – the scene I was there in which that black teenager said I'm Muslim by birth and I'm white on what everyone knew before all of those lies.'
I remember this in a way the evening before on our air which had a huge Black Eye as people, many a them from all areas in Bradford, Bradford Central, Southfield and in East Bradford as Sajeem and our air from the South Yorkshire Film Institute. People from as far south as Birmingham also had in Sajeh was with them that night and of all their familys on all aspects of family. Not in Yorkshire only where everyone would speak Black English a common phrase across most of these three areas was I was called the P**i' because when you say that black you have to refer from what he was in for when those things had become something you were white – this could cause conflict with that but the P**i it just made for many of them just how could we be on both sides, he it was that I was in touch also in Southfield so the things that I knew and to him so far out in north all the same people. Then there could.
Cap comentari:
Publica un comentari a l'entrada